The findings, written up
The tables answer questions you know to ask. The reports answer the ones you would have had to know to ask: which environments have no Managed Environment protection, which apps are owned by leavers, which premium connectors reach how many people, what would break if a tenant moved. Each is derived from the stored assessment, so re-running a sync re-runs all of them.
- Overview — the estate, how it is spread, and how it compares with itself over time
- Environments — type, region, Dataverse, protection level, and the outliers
- Connectors — usage ranked, split by tier and between apps and flows
- Pre-migration — what would have to move, and what would not survive the move
- Governance and Security — ownership, sharing reach, premium exposure and protection gaps
Environments report
Count on the left, workload on the right — and they rarely agree. Thirteen environments, five of them with Managed Environment protection, and a default environment holding more apps and flows than every sandbox put together. The gap between the two charts is the finding; the numbers are the same ones on the environments page, arranged for somebody being asked to approve something.
Every screen here is a live demo tenant
Contoso is sample data, generated rather than scanned — but it renders through exactly the same code as a real tenant, so what you walk around is what you would get.